Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18830
| From | Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: demise of sun.com |
| Date | 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k3aps7$8lt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <80d858l76kch632v7gdefamcecl18a646t@4ax.com> <821958dsvuebbng74ded6o3g436al8iktj@4ax.com> <gfmg585g6g120ttqhl6se32ebfuc0di7ik@4ax.com> |
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 04:27:39 -0700, /Roedy Green/: > There is a similar problem with RFCs. Old ones don't have a link to > the new replacement. There's a nifty tool at ietf.org which allows viewing RFC documents using HTML markup: http://tools.ietf.org/html/ The HTML version adds a header with 'Obsoleted by' and 'Updated by' links (and other useful information), for example: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc822 In my Mozilla browser I've setup a keyword bookmark [1] like: Location: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc%s Keyword: rfc Therefore typing "rfc 822" (or select/copy, or drag-n-drop) into the "Address" field of the browser opens the corresponding RFC document HTML version very conveniently for me. [1] <http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-search-from-address-bar>, <http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_keyword_searches>, <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Bookmark_Keywords>, <http://www-archive.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html> -- Stanimir
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 00:54 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 08:27 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-09-17 10:28 +0100
Re: demise of sun.com "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-17 06:51 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-17 10:40 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-17 17:39 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-18 04:27 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 19:41 +0000
Re: demise of sun.com Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 13:21 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 21:29 +0000
Re: demise of sun.com Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2012-09-19 13:30 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300
csiph-web