Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18830

Re: demise of sun.com

From Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: demise of sun.com
Date 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k3aps7$8lt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <80d858l76kch632v7gdefamcecl18a646t@4ax.com> <821958dsvuebbng74ded6o3g436al8iktj@4ax.com> <gfmg585g6g120ttqhl6se32ebfuc0di7ik@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Tue, 18 Sep 2012 04:27:39 -0700, /Roedy Green/:

> There is a similar problem with RFCs.  Old ones don't have a link to
> the new replacement.

There's a nifty tool at ietf.org which allows viewing RFC documents 
using HTML markup:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/

The HTML version adds a header with 'Obsoleted by' and 'Updated by' 
links (and other useful information), for example:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc822

In my Mozilla browser I've setup a keyword bookmark [1] like:

Location: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc%s
Keyword: rfc

Therefore typing "rfc 822" (or select/copy, or drag-n-drop) into the 
"Address" field of the browser opens the corresponding RFC document 
HTML version very conveniently for me.

[1] 
<http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-search-from-address-bar>, 
<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_keyword_searches>, 
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Bookmark_Keywords>, 
<http://www-archive.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html>

-- 
Stanimir

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 00:54 -0700
  Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 08:27 -0700
    Re: demise of sun.com Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-09-17 10:28 +0100
      Re: demise of sun.com "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-17 06:51 -0400
        Re: demise of sun.com Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-17 10:40 -0700
          Re: demise of sun.com Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-17 17:39 -0400
    Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-18 04:27 -0700
      Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 19:41 +0000
        Re: demise of sun.com Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 13:21 -0700
          Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 21:29 +0000
          Re: demise of sun.com Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2012-09-19 13:30 -0400
      Re: demise of sun.com Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300

csiph-web