Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38836

Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()

Path csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!ipa.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()
Date Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:23:38 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 14
Message-ID <m31s2ora05.fsf@sonera.fi> (permalink)
References <q7lbvc$152e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <And-20190329162634@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <q7lihk$3ut$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info ipa.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f2add765764eb7b8b20b32059a9dec47"; logging-data="3710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DgZCMcojLpZdKQUkUjVVP"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:dO1mX/584wpaB/1dSoEzaz6u+wY= sha1:9IF0N+QmAZw4iioLL6hUljh9vG8=
X-no-archive yes
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38836

Show key headers only | View raw


Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> writes:
> On 29/03/2019 15:30, Stefan Ram wrote:

>>   So one should check whether it is possible to refactor, i.e.,
>>   to split the method or improve the name.

> I was not allowed to change anything, other than implement the method.

You could have implemented it to call the methods resulting from the
split.
Besides, method names should start with a lowercase letter..

-- 
Jukka Lahtinen

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 15:01 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 11:19 -0400
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:42 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:47 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:53 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 19:42 +0100
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:53 +0000
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 10:19 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2019-03-30 11:23 +0200
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:16 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 13:20 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:21 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 04:56 -0700
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-03-29 15:40 -0700

csiph-web