Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38831

Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()

From	Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()
Date	2019-03-29 13:53 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<q7lm25$o5i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<q7lbvc$152e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q7ld2o$vqp$1@dont-email.me> <q7lhto$11u$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q7llnj$loj$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/29/2019 1:47 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
> [...]
>     public static int[] MergePurgeAndReverseSort_2(
>           Integer[] values1, Integer[] values2, boolean reverse) {
>        Set<Integer> allValues = Stream.concat(
>                 Arrays.asList(values1).stream(),
>                 Arrays.asList(values2).stream())
>  [...]

     Oh, ratzafratz!  There's no need for the asList() calls; I
could simply have used

	Stream.concat(Arrays.stream(values1), Arrays.stream(values2))

and avoided all that silly running around.  Sorry about that, Chief.

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Six hundred sixty-three days to go.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 15:01 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 11:19 -0400
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:42 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:47 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:53 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 19:42 +0100
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:53 +0000
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 10:19 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2019-03-30 11:23 +0200
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:16 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 13:20 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:21 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 04:56 -0700
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-03-29 15:40 -0700

csiph-web