Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!ipa.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jukka Lahtinen Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:23:38 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ipa.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f2add765764eb7b8b20b32059a9dec47"; logging-data="3710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DgZCMcojLpZdKQUkUjVVP" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dO1mX/584wpaB/1dSoEzaz6u+wY= sha1:9IF0N+QmAZw4iioLL6hUljh9vG8= X-no-archive: yes Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38836 Graeme Geldenhuys writes: > On 29/03/2019 15:30, Stefan Ram wrote: >> So one should check whether it is possible to refactor, i.e., >> to split the method or improve the name. > I was not allowed to change anything, other than implement the method. You could have implemented it to call the methods resulting from the split. Besides, method names should start with a lowercase letter.. -- Jukka Lahtinen