Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22153
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: refactoring problem |
| Date | Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:15:57 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <keshsl$ubc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <7fssg8dakvofmv6pk3sfvp5jmaku55vgmm@4ax.com> <kem88s$72o$1@dont-email.me> <510ea8de$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <510fa7c1$0$6978$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <0453206c-7053-4cf0-8ab2-b6c5e817a69a@googlegroups.com> <kerah4$uka$1@dont-email.me> <5111c368$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:15:33 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fba3415ba68d85d643935af2f52f0b4b"; logging-data="31084"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/U7XVRReYDXGN6kf8vCEykGMSB1MHDDFM=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <5111c368$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:9vWbzv/PQfuvr9s9YjjlN84Gu08= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22153 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2/5/2013 6:43 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 2/5/2013 11:04 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote: >> For what it's worth, I would say the biggest mistake that Java made was >> in the exclusion of unsigned integer types, or, most perniciously, the >> decision to make the byte datatype be signed. > > I hate that as well. > >> That doesn't necessarily >> mean I would want to see it changed at this point, however. > > ulong/uint/ushort/ubyte would actually not be that intrusive. For what it's worth: <https://blogs.oracle.com/darcy/entry/unsigned_api>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 06:30 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-03 16:23 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 12:27 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 15:37 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2013-02-03 15:21 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 17:38 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 16:46 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 14:36 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 11:34 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-03 11:54 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:13 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-02-03 10:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-03 10:50 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 21:38 +0100
Re: refactoring problem "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-02-04 08:11 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-04 03:56 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 13:21 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 22:15 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:49 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:51 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:53 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:48 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 17:08 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-05 10:07 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:13 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:31 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:42 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:33 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-05 01:50 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 10:04 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-05 10:38 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 13:53 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:43 -0500
Re: refactoring problem markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-05 19:15 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-08 23:58 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-02-05 11:09 +0100
csiph-web