Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22045
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: refactoring problem |
| Date | 2013-02-03 16:23 +0000 |
| Organization | UK Free Software Network |
| Message-ID | <kem2t6$jah$1@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | <7fssg8dakvofmv6pk3sfvp5jmaku55vgmm@4ax.com> |
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:30:40 -0800, Roedy Green wrote: > Consider the following refactoring problem. > > There is a hunk of almost identical code that appears multiple times. > It sets up 6 local variables. > > I would like to encapsulate it. > > > I could create a separate class just to hold the values. This is > tedious, but it may be the only way. > ...which you can return from a method. I keep wondering whether I should use this approach but so far haven't used it. > I think, why can methods have multiple inputs, but only one output? I > have been thinking that for about 50 years, and it ,seems unlikely to > change soon. > Formally true, but not necessarily so in practice. You can return a class instance containing as many variables as you need to return. You can also pass the constructor a reference to a mutable object which contains the variables you want to change. I use this quite a lot: its particularly useful for letting logically separate sets of methods access and manipulate a collection: each set of methods forms a class that's handed a reference to the collection. Example: I've just finished dealing with a way of handling a collection of geographical points: Each point forms a Waypoint that contains coordinates and descriptive attributes together with the methods needed to access its (immutable) attributes. The collection forms a WaypointList class that holds a set of Waypoints as an ArrayList plus two TreeMaps that give keyed access to Waypoints and methods needed to add, remove and retrieve individual Waypoints. There is a requirement to read a waypoint file into the WaypointList and to write it out to a file: there are currently five externally defined waypoint file formats I need to deal with so there is a set of classes, one per file format, that each implement a load() and a save() method. In addition there will be three programs that carry out more complex operations on one or more WaypointLists: only one of these has been written so far. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 06:30 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-03 16:23 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 12:27 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 15:37 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2013-02-03 15:21 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 17:38 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 16:46 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 14:36 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 11:34 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-03 11:54 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:13 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-02-03 10:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-03 10:50 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 21:38 +0100
Re: refactoring problem "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-02-04 08:11 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-04 03:56 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 13:21 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 22:15 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:49 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:51 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:53 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:48 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 17:08 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-05 10:07 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:13 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:31 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:42 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:33 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-05 01:50 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 10:04 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-05 10:38 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 13:53 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:43 -0500
Re: refactoring problem markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-05 19:15 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-08 23:58 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-02-05 11:09 +0100
csiph-web