Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22127
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-05 13:13 -0800 |
| References | (5 earlier) <5110250b$0$6843$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <b4907b1d-c674-474f-b4ff-d6513cb109cf@googlegroups.com> <51103acc$0$6914$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <fc9b5c8e-1673-4481-919f-5385b792bbaa@googlegroups.com> <5110cbc0$0$6855$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
| Message-ID | <e80ad67a-75d7-4794-ab76-b1004a983d1b@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: refactoring problem |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Silvio wrote: > Lew wrote: >> Silvio wrote: >>> Lew wrote: >>>> Silvio wrote: >>>>> But as always, tastes will differ. > >>>> Well, the decisions as to what actually makes it into Java or not are not made on the basis >>>> of taste. >>>> >>>> Which is arguably the worst of seemingly plausible criteria for inclusion. > >>> Well, what where those decisions based on then? > >> Engineering considerations. Logic. Estimated utility. Cost of implementation vs. expected benefit. > >>> Something else than the personal taste of a small group of influential insiders? > >> Yep. > > Well, no. I closely followed a number of the discussions about language > additions (among which the endless series of discussions about closures) > and personal preference of a small group of people is definitely a major > factor. "Preference" != "taste". > Of course their preferences will have been influenced by such factors > but since these are either subjective or estimates personal opinions > remain important. "Opinion" != "taste". > I am not saying this is bad per se. That was your opinion. You have not shown that their influence or thoughts were influenced by taste. What I've read of those discussions were all motivated by engineering considerations. I did not detect anything of taste in the justifications. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 06:30 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-03 16:23 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 12:27 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-03 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 15:37 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2013-02-03 15:21 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 17:38 -0400
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 16:46 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 14:36 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 11:34 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-03 11:54 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:13 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-02-03 10:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-03 13:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-03 10:50 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 21:38 +0100
Re: refactoring problem "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-02-04 08:11 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-04 03:56 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 13:21 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 12:35 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 22:15 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:49 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:51 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 13:53 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-04 23:48 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 17:08 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-02-05 10:07 +0100
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:13 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:20 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 13:31 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:42 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:33 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:32 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-02-05 01:50 +0000
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 10:04 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-05 10:38 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2013-02-05 13:53 -0600
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-05 21:43 -0500
Re: refactoring problem markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-05 19:15 -0800
Re: refactoring problem Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-08 23:58 -0500
Re: refactoring problem Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-02-05 11:09 +0100
csiph-web