Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16088
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: throw null investigation |
| Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:33:52 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <ju7a51$d92$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a8e60469-b392-4a98-b845-42caa79f7959@googlegroups.com> <GhENr.7926$jA7.4844@newsfe15.iad> <ju76n5$pcv$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:34:25 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="af443352c696022ce926c3d891feba1d"; logging-data="13602"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tGMTb8zP+jEqRZK/NzxSa" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 |
| In-Reply-To | <ju76n5$pcv$1@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:XEtgJgIhXCtE3hbg5yMQCGEoWIY= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:16088 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 18/07/2012 22:35, markspace allegedly wrote: > On 7/18/2012 12:39 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: >> On 7/18/12 10:10 AM, bob smith wrote: >>> Is it common practice to throw a null exception when writing JNI code? >>> >>> I'm seeing an exception that is simply a null rather than an object, >>> and I'm wondering if it's because it's easier to do that in JNI. >>> >> From what I can tell, that shouldn't ever happen. I'm not sure in JNI, >> but I know in Java if you throw a "null", it will instead throw a >> NullPointerException, so anyone catching that Throwable will not see a >> "null" value, but instead a NullPointerException instance. >> > > > In Java, yes. But in JNI, in C, I'd expect it is possible to literally > throw an empty or null pointer. > > I'd also expect that any code that did that was sub-par, and not worth > using or debugging. > > I'm mildly interested in what the OP is using, mostly so I can avoid it. > However if he can supply some details (*what* are you using, Bob?) I'd > consider taking a loot at it. The actually question he asks: "Is it > common practice," I don't really know or care. It seems bad practice, > but I've never dealt with JNI code, so what do I know? > But if the JNI code actually wanted to throw an NPE, and teh Jav wraps a null into an NPE, wouldn't it actually be more efficient if the JNI code "threw" a null? -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
throw null investigation bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-07-18 10:10 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 12:39 -0700
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-18 23:33 +0200
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 14:43 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-19 00:06 +0200
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 15:55 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 16:00 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 16:16 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-18 17:09 -0700
csiph-web