Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16084
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: throw null investigation |
| Date | 2012-07-18 13:35 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ju76n5$pcv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a8e60469-b392-4a98-b845-42caa79f7959@googlegroups.com> <GhENr.7926$jA7.4844@newsfe15.iad> |
On 7/18/2012 12:39 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: > On 7/18/12 10:10 AM, bob smith wrote: >> Is it common practice to throw a null exception when writing JNI code? >> >> I'm seeing an exception that is simply a null rather than an object, >> and I'm wondering if it's because it's easier to do that in JNI. >> > From what I can tell, that shouldn't ever happen. I'm not sure in JNI, > but I know in Java if you throw a "null", it will instead throw a > NullPointerException, so anyone catching that Throwable will not see a > "null" value, but instead a NullPointerException instance. > In Java, yes. But in JNI, in C, I'd expect it is possible to literally throw an empty or null pointer. I'd also expect that any code that did that was sub-par, and not worth using or debugging. I'm mildly interested in what the OP is using, mostly so I can avoid it. However if he can supply some details (*what* are you using, Bob?) I'd consider taking a loot at it. The actually question he asks: "Is it common practice," I don't really know or care. It seems bad practice, but I've never dealt with JNI code, so what do I know?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
throw null investigation bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-07-18 10:10 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 12:39 -0700
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-18 23:33 +0200
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 14:43 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-19 00:06 +0200
Re: throw null investigation markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-18 15:55 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 16:00 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-18 16:16 -0700
Re: throw null investigation Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-18 17:09 -0700
csiph-web