Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10474
| From | Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java developers |
| Date | 2011-12-04 10:50 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jbeck7$lna$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <curixinfotech.540mfz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> <jbac2n$i92$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4d64c0ddb36a3aca8ae9da657204f99d@dizum.com> |
On 2011-12-03 04:18:26 +1100, Nomen Nescio said: > Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 2011-11-30 23:14:37 +1100, curixinfotech said: >> >>> why java is the language of choice for Developers. > > It isn't, it's *a* heavyweight system for cross platform GUI scripting. I would beg to differ much on this point. Visual Basic supports the COM (Computer Open Model) and it will automatically generate code from the IDL (Internal Definition Language). This makes it easy to execute codes even inside the bowels of the operating system. In fact, Visual Basic allows the user to create their own COM objects which can be consumed by operating system. This is not GUI scripting. I think you are confused by the VBScript which is a different thing (VBScript is perhaps more like Ruby or Python but considerably more advanced). >> Visual Basic is very advanced language (it doesn't require line >> numbers) > > Assembly language doesn't require line numbers Well, even if assembly language doesn't have line numbers, Visual Basic is superior to assembly language. It has better font support. > >> and it supports structured programming. > > Structured programming is for steers and queers. Which one are you, boy? I do not practice the perversions you nominate. I think those perversions are more common with Java developers. > >> You cannot go wrong with it. > > Oh I think you can. Java enshrines many wrongnesses. For example the excessive use of the factory pattern, like for example factory factories and factory factory factories.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java developers curixinfotech <curixinfotech.540mfz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> - 2011-11-30 07:14 -0500
Re: java developers Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-30 07:55 -0500
Re: java developers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-30 06:32 -0800
Re: java developers Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-30 09:41 -0800
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 17:03 -0500
Re: java developers Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-02 14:30 -0800
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 18:40 -0500
Re: java developers Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-03 14:42 +0000
Re: java developers Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-03 10:09 -0500
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:17 -0500
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:11 -0500
Re: java developers curixinfotech <curixinfotech.54dibz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> - 2011-12-07 05:56 -0500
Re: java developers Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-02 01:48 -0800
Re: java developers Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> - 2011-12-02 22:16 +1100
Re: java developers David Segall <david@address.invalid> - 2011-12-02 23:17 +1100
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 16:29 -0500
Re: java developers David Segall <david@address.invalid> - 2011-12-03 15:15 +1100
Re: java developers Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-02 03:39 -0800
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-02 14:43 +0100
Re: java developers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 07:32 -0800
Re: java developers Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-12-02 18:18 +0100
Re: java developers Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> - 2011-12-04 10:50 +1100
Re: java developers Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2011-12-03 19:43 -0800
Re: java developers Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-04 10:56 +0000
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-05 11:00 +0100
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-05 22:38 -0500
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-06 10:33 +0100
Re: java developers Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-06 21:17 +0000
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-07 15:09 +0100
Re: java developers dsnitelex@gmail.com - 2011-12-02 21:51 -0800
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-03 10:51 +0100
Re: java developers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-03 11:41 -0400
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:28 -0500
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-05 10:31 +0100
Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-05 22:35 -0500
Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-06 10:25 +0100
Re: java developers Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-06 21:10 +0000
Re: java developers BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 22:52 -0800
Re: java developers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-06 06:49 -0400
csiph-web