Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rajiv Gupta Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: java developers Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:50:31 +1100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <4d64c0ddb36a3aca8ae9da657204f99d@dizum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nkFEEnOpdWgDxOl3Ga1U7w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Unison/2.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10474 On 2011-12-03 04:18:26 +1100, Nomen Nescio said: > Rajiv Gupta wrote: > >> On 2011-11-30 23:14:37 +1100, curixinfotech said: >> >>> why java is the language of choice for Developers. > > It isn't, it's *a* heavyweight system for cross platform GUI scripting. I would beg to differ much on this point. Visual Basic supports the COM (Computer Open Model) and it will automatically generate code from the IDL (Internal Definition Language). This makes it easy to execute codes even inside the bowels of the operating system. In fact, Visual Basic allows the user to create their own COM objects which can be consumed by operating system. This is not GUI scripting. I think you are confused by the VBScript which is a different thing (VBScript is perhaps more like Ruby or Python but considerably more advanced). >> Visual Basic is very advanced language (it doesn't require line >> numbers) > > Assembly language doesn't require line numbers Well, even if assembly language doesn't have line numbers, Visual Basic is superior to assembly language. It has better font support. > >> and it supports structured programming. > > Structured programming is for steers and queers. Which one are you, boy? I do not practice the perversions you nominate. I think those perversions are more common with Java developers. > >> You cannot go wrong with it. > > Oh I think you can. Java enshrines many wrongnesses. For example the excessive use of the factory pattern, like for example factory factories and factory factory factories.