Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10356

Re: java developers

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: java developers
Date	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:55:08 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	30
Message-ID	<jb593f$8mb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<curixinfotech.540mfz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="HSlJAUb3pGXi3i7ZL/HoAw"; logging-data="8907"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+N0vgB7hb2QDEK5UqWw3j1"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To	<curixinfotech.540mfz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:LTDMVKuL1n2iU8MlVe4E3DG1pao=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10356

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/30/2011 7:14 AM, curixinfotech wrote:
> why java is the language of choice for Developers.

     For the same reason that Sanskrit is the language of choice
for botanists.

     In other words, the question's premise is flawed: There is
no single "language of choice," but a choice of languages.
Different languages have different characteristics that make
them more or less suitable for a particular set of tasks.  Some
languages are chosen often, some are chosen infrequently -- but
no language is chosen always, and no "serious" language is chosen
never.

     Questions very like yours are sometimes posed by people seeking
to enter the programming trade and wondering which language to build
a career on.  If that's your situation, then once again the question
makes little sense.  This is a fashion-driven industry in many ways,
where languages and frameworks and disciplines and paradigms rise and
fall like hem lines.  You may make a career as a programer, but you
will not make a career as a Java programmer or as a Python programmer
or as a COBOL programmer or as an AnySingleLanguage programmer.  Expect
to use many languages over time, some regularly and repeatedly, some
just a few times in special cases.  If you're the world's best Java
programmer but will not learn Guava or Canberra or Mastodon or
whatever the next fashion is, your career will be brief and boring.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid

Thread

java developers curixinfotech <curixinfotech.540mfz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> - 2011-11-30 07:14 -0500
  Re: java developers Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-30 07:55 -0500
    Re: java developers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-30 06:32 -0800
      Re: java developers Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-30 09:41 -0800
      Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 17:03 -0500
        Re: java developers Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-02 14:30 -0800
          Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 18:40 -0500
            Re: java developers Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-03 14:42 +0000
              Re: java developers Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-03 10:09 -0500
                Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:17 -0500
              Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:11 -0500
    Re: java developers curixinfotech <curixinfotech.54dibz@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> - 2011-12-07 05:56 -0500
  Re: java developers Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-02 01:48 -0800
  Re: java developers Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> - 2011-12-02 22:16 +1100
    Re: java developers David Segall <david@address.invalid> - 2011-12-02 23:17 +1100
      Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 16:29 -0500
        Re: java developers David Segall <david@address.invalid> - 2011-12-03 15:15 +1100
    Re: java developers Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-02 03:39 -0800
    Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-02 14:43 +0100
    Re: java developers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 07:32 -0800
    Re: java developers Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-12-02 18:18 +0100
      Re: java developers Rajiv Gupta <rajiv@invalid.com> - 2011-12-04 10:50 +1100
        Re: java developers Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2011-12-03 19:43 -0800
        Re: java developers Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-04 10:56 +0000
        Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-05 11:00 +0100
          Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-05 22:38 -0500
            Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-06 10:33 +0100
          Re: java developers Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-06 21:17 +0000
            Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-07 15:09 +0100
  Re: java developers dsnitelex@gmail.com - 2011-12-02 21:51 -0800
    Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-03 10:51 +0100
      Re: java developers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-03 11:41 -0400
      Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-04 22:28 -0500
        Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-05 10:31 +0100
          Re: java developers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-05 22:35 -0500
            Re: java developers Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-12-06 10:25 +0100
        Re: java developers Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-06 21:10 +0000
    Re: java developers BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 22:52 -0800
      Re: java developers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-06 06:49 -0400

csiph-web