Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8416
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | markspace <-@.> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling |
| Date | Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:49:40 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <j64oem$ln$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <CAA3EEF8.78BF%bravegag@hotmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109242028540.12593@urchin.earth.li> <9e8aqfFnorU1@mid.individual.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109272044210.14737@urchin.earth.li> <9efsnrFoviU1@mid.individual.net> <j5vdvo$kon$1@dont-email.me> <FL2dndua_qLJIx7TnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <j62666$m5s$1@dont-email.me> <2026012.1217.1317394005581.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfc6> <j64mre$mj4$1@dont-email.me> <5746278.1755.1317396632057.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prec11> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="695"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ptEAuiijMYvqF7xWL7vb7vNDeYlWmXQs=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <5746278.1755.1317396632057.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prec11> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:9ftEC9Mrj/GE+iaqhADmgXXWuCc= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8416 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 9/30/2011 8:30 AM, Lew wrote: > markspace wrote: >> Not all multi-threading requires context switching either. > > Huh? > Imagine a situation where the number of threads is matched to the number of CPUs. No need to switch out a context there (though it might happen anyway, there isn't a *need*). Just pass data back and forth. Memory barriers (happens-before in Java) is all you need in this case.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 20:32 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-24 20:46 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 23:09 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:33 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-27 20:52 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 08:21 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 08:20 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 18:56 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 11:07 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-09-28 17:39 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-29 09:25 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 07:46 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:22 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 08:30 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:49 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-30 20:57 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-09-25 00:26 -0400
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:13 +0200
csiph-web