Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8279
| From | "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling |
| Date | 2011-09-25 00:26 -0400 |
| Organization | The Wasteland |
| Message-ID | <nospam-B50BCA.00262125092011@news.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAA3EEF8.78BF%bravegag@hotmail.com> |
In article <CAA3EEF8.78BF%bravegag@hotmail.com>, Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> wrote: > I need to build a Client-Middleware-Database architecture in the > context of a course in my grad studies. In a nutshell, multiple > Client component instances connect and send random DML statements to > multiple Middleware (server) which in turn execute those DML against > a Database server and send the results back to the Clients. After > carefully studding the description and requirements I have two > choices for the communication between the Client and Middleware: > > - Classic sockets + thread pool. > - NIO multiplexing. > > I think I will end implementing both but I am curious in the case of > the NIO multiplexing: in your experience would it increase > performance to setup a Thread Pool and associate one SelectionKey to > one specific Thread in the pool so that all read/write operations for > each specific channel go through one specific Thread from the Pool? > From all code examples/tutorials/books I have reviewed online the > "Selector Thread" seems like a bottleneck to me. I haven't seen this > approach anywhere so that's why I am asking. This related thread may be helpful: <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/browse_thread/thread/cd054f226e2d5c82> -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com <http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 20:32 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-24 20:46 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 23:09 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:33 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-27 20:52 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 08:21 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 08:20 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 18:56 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 11:07 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-09-28 17:39 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-29 09:25 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 07:46 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:22 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 08:30 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:49 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-30 20:57 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-09-25 00:26 -0400
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:13 +0200
csiph-web