Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8399
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | markspace <-@.> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling |
| Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:41 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 12 |
| Message-ID | <j62666$m5s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <CAA3EEF8.78BF%bravegag@hotmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109242028540.12593@urchin.earth.li> <9e8aqfFnorU1@mid.individual.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109272044210.14737@urchin.earth.li> <9efsnrFoviU1@mid.individual.net> <j5vdvo$kon$1@dont-email.me> <FL2dndua_qLJIx7TnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:25:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="22716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0V+DLLwa+YzURjcq4O27JCYygsMaB508=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <FL2dndua_qLJIx7TnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:mOUpoDPYYexuBJx3cugZ4T/JJbU= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8399 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 9/28/2011 5:39 PM, Peter Duniho wrote: > I don't have specific numbers. But I can tell you that synchronization > overhead, and in particular the cost of a thread context switch, is one > of the reasons that i/o completion ports on Windows is such a critical > technique for scalable networking processes. Interesting.... <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2794535/linux-and-i-o-completion-ports>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 20:32 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-24 20:46 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-24 23:09 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:33 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-09-27 20:52 +0100
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 08:21 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 08:20 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-28 18:56 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-28 11:07 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-09-28 17:39 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-29 09:25 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 07:46 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:22 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-30 08:30 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-30 08:49 -0700
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-30 20:57 +0200
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-09-25 00:26 -0400
Re: NIO multiplexing + thread pooling Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:13 +0200
csiph-web