Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6869

Re: A quota based lock

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: A quota based lock
Date	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:48:35 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	16
Message-ID	<j1p40f$jua$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<83f81158-8aee-486d-a51b-c0f7dfdbb0da@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <j1oj30$tut$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:48:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="mz/LDSJwiWnk3Jnnqg7x+Q"; logging-data="20426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JAcGeZjghsjcjirZBxKym"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To	<j1oj30$tut$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:CGAIPDk5Xj8VEd0GQWHAsFsG03E=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6869

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8/8/2011 4:58 AM, Eric Sosman wrote:
> Failing that, I'd suggest keeping things as simple as possible.
> Start with an ordinary queue, with each worker joining the end of
> the queue when it wants the resource and then getting the resource
> when it reaches the front. If Worker A holds the resource (and
> eventually releases it), all the other workers will get a crack at
> it (if they want it) before A gets it again. Don't mess around with
> quotas or priorities or whatnot until and unless the simple solution
> is found wanting.

I like that idea with a twist, have the higher priority jobs get put in 
the queue closer to the top.

-- 

Knute Johnson

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-08 00:13 -0700
  Re: A quota based lock Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-08 07:58 -0400
    Re: A quota based lock Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-08-08 09:48 -0700
      Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 10:00 -0700
        Re: A quota based lock Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-08-08 11:39 -0700
          Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 11:57 -0700
            Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-08 21:46 +0200
              Re: A quota based lock Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-08 20:41 -0400
                Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-10 09:36 +0200
                Re: A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 04:40 -0700
                Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-10 18:55 +0200
                Re: A quota based lock Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:26 +0000
                Re: A quota based lock Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-10 12:37 -0700
                Re: A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 18:30 -0700
                Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-10 19:17 -0700
                Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-11 12:32 +0200
          Re: A quota based lock Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-09 21:00 +0100
  Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 07:58 -0700
  Re: A quota based lock Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-09 21:45 +0100

csiph-web