Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6869
| From | Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: A quota based lock |
| Date | 2011-08-08 09:48 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j1p40f$jua$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <83f81158-8aee-486d-a51b-c0f7dfdbb0da@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <j1oj30$tut$1@dont-email.me> |
On 8/8/2011 4:58 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: > Failing that, I'd suggest keeping things as simple as possible. > Start with an ordinary queue, with each worker joining the end of > the queue when it wants the resource and then getting the resource > when it reaches the front. If Worker A holds the resource (and > eventually releases it), all the other workers will get a crack at > it (if they want it) before A gets it again. Don't mess around with > quotas or priorities or whatnot until and unless the simple solution > is found wanting. I like that idea with a twist, have the higher priority jobs get put in the queue closer to the top. -- Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-08 00:13 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-08 07:58 -0400
Re: A quota based lock Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-08-08 09:48 -0700
Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 10:00 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-08-08 11:39 -0700
Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 11:57 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-08 21:46 +0200
Re: A quota based lock Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-08 20:41 -0400
Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-10 09:36 +0200
Re: A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 04:40 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-10 18:55 +0200
Re: A quota based lock Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:26 +0000
Re: A quota based lock Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-10 12:37 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Robert Stark <panxiaozhong@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 18:30 -0700
Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-10 19:17 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-11 12:32 +0200
Re: A quota based lock Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-09 21:00 +0100
Re: A quota based lock markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-08 07:58 -0700
Re: A quota based lock Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-09 21:45 +0100
csiph-web