Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4583
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java generics and type erasure |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | Thu, 26 May 2011 10:18:20 +1200 |
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <irjv7c$iv0$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink) |
| References | <9d4c2b16-beb5-40b1-87a2-f03e971efeed@k17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <nospam-871A48.22542123052011@news.aioe.org> <irfgkl$lca$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEF8515AF3B6vaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irh6kb$gse$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEFA3AE378DDvaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irhhik$9rc$3@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 118-92-95-178.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Trace | lust.ihug.co.nz 1306361900 19424 118.92.95.178 (25 May 2011 22:18:20 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@ihug.co.nz |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 25 May 2011 22:18:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.7 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4583 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer
Show key headers only | View raw
In message <irhhik$9rc$3@dont-email.me>, Susan Calvin wrote: > The only reason I can think of for not doing this (the logic seems simple > enough to implement) is that it turned out doing so would break legacy > code that used util collections' raw types. Was that why? Yup. Much of the complexity attendant on introducing generics into Java was precisely because of that need for backward compatibility. > Perhaps there should be a compile flag that turns on the legacy-compatible > behavior for use when compiling 1.4 and older sources, but which is off by > default? What happens when you mix code compiled with that flag, with code that was compiled without?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400
csiph-web