Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4546
| From | Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java generics and type erasure |
| Date | 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <332d40a8-689d-44bd-af0a-a7349aeb7217@y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9d4c2b16-beb5-40b1-87a2-f03e971efeed@k17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <nospam-871A48.22542123052011@news.aioe.org> <irfgkl$lca$1@news.albasani.net> |
> John B. Matthews wrote:
>
> It's subtler than that. The generic parameter is on 'Foo', not the map. The
> map type does not depend on the type parameter. So the question is why the
> 'get()' returns 'Object'. Naively, one would expect the type of 'bar' to
> resolve to 'Map<String, Integer>' no matter what '<T>' is, or isn't.
>
> The only thing I can think of is that leaving the type parameter out in the
> containing class means that all bets are off, and the compiler gives up on
> generics throughout that variable's depth. Thus it doesn't even bother to
> parse the 'bar' parameters, defaulting thus to '<?,?>'. Consequently, the
> type of the expression 'foo2.bar.get("x")' is 'Object'. The assignment target
> of that expression is 'Integer', and that requires an explicit downcast,
> omitted in the code along with the type parameter.
>
> This is an object lesson (pun intended) in how bad it really can be to omit
> the type parameter.
>
> I haven't looked up chapter and verse on this reasoning yet. Anyone care to
> rise to the challenge?
To be honest before asking on group I've tried to search the answer in
JLS, unfortunatelly without any success -- I have same observations as
yours but I didn't manage to find exact explanation.
--
greegings
Marcin Pietraszek
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400
csiph-web