Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4650
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java generics and type erasure |
| Date | 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <iroc18$oho$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <irlega$3kp$1@news.albasani.net> <4ddf0617$0$67777$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <3f7c1f48-f025-48af-b6bd-20463f6651db@e13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <irncss$k84$2@news.albasani.net> <4ddf5c23$0$67779$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> |
Esmond Pitt wrote: > Lew wrote: >> erasure (the way I look at it) is a runtime phenomenon. I don't care if >> it happened during compilation or class load. > That doesn't make sense. Erasure is a state that has already been attained > prior to execution. It can't be a runtime phenomenon as there hasn't been any > runtime yet: indeed there may never be a runtime for it to be a phenomenon of, > e.g. if the class is immediately recompiled prior to any execution, or indeed > never executed at all. You elided the part of my statement that answers your objection. What I *SAID* that you chopped out was: "... it's not the process of erasure that interests me, but the static state of having or not having been erased. Not erased - compile time. Erased - runtime. Therefore erasure (the way I look at it) is a runtime phenomenon. I don't care if it happened during compilation or class load." It makes perfect sense. You will note that I did NOT say that which you refuted; I did NOT say that it got erased at runtime. I said that the runtime phenomenon is the static state of generics HAVING ALREADY BEEN ERASED SOMETIME *PRIOR*. It's the *static* state to which I refer. See, Esmond Pitt? You did not contradict that at all, Esmond Pitt. Get it now, Esmond Pitt? -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400
csiph-web