Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3823
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) |
| Date | Sun, 08 May 2011 19:55:30 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 10 |
| Message-ID | <iq6leh$vuh$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <tqmdnUiqqro_tlvQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <iq60p4$9i5$2@news.albasani.net> <ePSdnRoHk4tSSVvQnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 8 May 2011 17:55:29 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ujjzbENlA81PtoTBdY731Q"; logging-data="32721"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cTZYPFyjU0PEkavwy7CeJ" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <ePSdnRoHk4tSSVvQnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:jonui3uLilkpXyNgsg7X3NkuRaM= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3823 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 08/05/2011 19:37, Qu0ll allegedly wrote: > Time for a different news reader it seems. Any suggestions? Thunderbird is decent. It lacks a bit on sigs and message filters, and killfiling is tedious. But it's decent. -- DF. An escaped convict once said to me: "Alcatraz is the place to be"
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 15:35 +1000
Re: JNA performance Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-07 22:48 -0700
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 16:03 +1000
Re: JNA performance Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-08 09:54 -0700
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:26 -0700
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 08:44 +1000
Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:17 -0400
Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:20 -0400
Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:24 -0400
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 13:39 +1000
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 21:54 -0700
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 15:47 +1000
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 23:26 -0700
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 17:07 +1000
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-10 12:44 -0700
Re: JNA performance Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-09 18:21 +0100
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-09 13:05 -0700
Re: JNA performance Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-09 21:09 +0100
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-09 17:58 -0700
Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-07 23:25 -0700
Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 16:32 +1000
Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:27 -0700
Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 07:58 -0400
Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:17 -0700
Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 08:36 -0400
Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-09 06:34 -0700
Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 09:57 -0400
O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 08:02 -0400
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-08 11:24 -0300
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 12:35 -0400
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-08 09:54 -0700
Re: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 03:37 +1000
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-09 15:50 +1200
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 08:36 -0400
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 03:37 +1000
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:55 +0200
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:30 +0000
Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:28 -0700
Re: JNA performance Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-09 08:54 -0600
csiph-web