Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3791

Re: JNA performance

From	Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: JNA performance
Date	2011-05-07 23:25 -0700
Organization	Canadian Mind Products
Message-ID	<qmdcs6hrgicldcrr8sa3irkr3n1me4vaon@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<tqmdnUiqqro_tlvQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 8 May 2011 15:35:08 +1000, "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com>
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>I am about to do some Java programming involving native libraries so can 
>anyone comment on their experiences with the performance of JNA?  I note the 
>following (somewhat concerning) statement from the JNA website:

I presume you mean JNI not JNA.

The problem with JNI is the overhead of calling a JNI method is very
high.  What you save by writing machine code or C you lose by the
extra overhead of the call.

You have to do a fair chunk of work on the C side to make it pay. Most
often it is used to tie into a well-written legacy library.

See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jni.html
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
How long did it take after the car was invented before owners understood 
cars would not work unless you regularly changed the oil and the tires?
We have gone 33 years and still it is rare to uncover a user who 
understands computers don't work without regular backups.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 15:35 +1000
  Re: JNA performance Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-07 22:48 -0700
    Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 16:03 +1000
      Re: JNA performance Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-08 09:54 -0700
    Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:26 -0700
      Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 08:44 +1000
        Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:17 -0400
        Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:20 -0400
          Re: JNA performance Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-08 21:24 -0400
            Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 13:39 +1000
              Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 21:54 -0700
                Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 15:47 +1000
                Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 23:26 -0700
                Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 17:07 +1000
                Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-10 12:44 -0700
        Re: JNA performance Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-09 18:21 +0100
          Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-09 13:05 -0700
            Re: JNA performance Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-09 21:09 +0100
              Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-09 17:58 -0700
  Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-07 23:25 -0700
    Re: JNA performance "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 16:32 +1000
    Re: JNA performance Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:27 -0700
  Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 07:58 -0400
    Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:17 -0700
      Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 08:36 -0400
        Re: JNA performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-09 06:34 -0700
          Re: JNA performance Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 09:57 -0400
  O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 08:02 -0400
    Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-08 11:24 -0300
      Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 12:35 -0400
        Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-08 09:54 -0700
      Re: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 03:37 +1000
      Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-09 15:50 +1200
        Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 08:36 -0400
    Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 03:37 +1000
      Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:55 +0200
        Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:30 +0000
          Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-05-08 13:28 -0700
  Re: JNA performance Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-09 08:54 -0600

csiph-web