Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2750
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: ORM or JDBC? |
| Date | 2011-04-02 10:25 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <in7bjt$p0n$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <IX7lp.805$YL5.263@newsfe05.iad> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104012238090.16545@urchin.earth.li> <LQslp.6717$sS4.1488@newsfe11.iad> <in62hr$odq$6@lust.ihug.co.nz> <QKElp.4837$0s5.485@newsfe17.iad> |
Arved Sandstrom wrote: > There is no super-distinct boundary, no. But there is a boundary > nonetheless. In the conceptual (semantic) model when we are thinking > about Person, we'll have a notion of Person identity - what attributes > of Person make them unique - but at this level that uniqueness could be > opaquely described as PersonID of no particular datatype, and we then go > on to discuss other attributes of Person that are necessary for the > business problem. Similarly, when thinking at this conceptual level > about LifeEvent, we might simply say that each LifeEvent instance will > point at a Person using the PersonId value. To this excellent taxonomy I would add only that the conceptual "PersonID" would identify the natural, or innate identifying data, one might say the "primary key". That's not correct at this level, though - what we're aiming for are the attributes that determine entity identity within the semantic model. A surrogate key, such as an integer-valued ID that perhaps is from a sequence, is something introduced in the physical model. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: ORM or JDBC? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-03-31 13:19 +1300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-03-31 20:16 -0300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-01 13:10 +1300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-01 20:12 -0300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 15:45 +1300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:21 -0300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-01 22:38 +0100
Re: ORM or JDBC? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-01 20:03 -0300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 15:44 +1300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:35 -0300
Re: ORM or JDBC? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 10:25 -0400
csiph-web