Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2665

Re: Wonder Why Not Paths

From	Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Wonder Why Not Paths
Date	2011-03-31 22:18 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<in2niv$vlv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<in1jp3$65c$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <in2gud$b2g$1@dont-email.me> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103312109390.5114@urchin.earth.li>

Show all headers | View raw

On 31/03/2011 22:13, Tom Anderson allegedly wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Daniele Futtorovic wrote:
>
>> On 31/03/2011 12:07, Lawrence D'Oliveiro allegedly wrote:
>>> A Drawable can be a ShapeDrawable, which can be constructed from a
>>> PathShape. But the resource definition
>>> <http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/drawable-resource.html#Shape>
>>>
>>> does not allow for paths.
>>>
>>> Curious omission, considering all the fancy stuff which has been added
>>> elsewhere.
>>
>> All the people giving a flying fuck about Android core libraries raise
>> your hand.
>
> Time for clj.android, perhaps?
>
> Still, the number of posts about Android are handily outnumbered by the
> number of posts of utterly worthless flaming and nitpicking that aren't
> even about anything. Why, in this thread alone, the ratio is 1:2!

Ahh... Feels so good to be on the winning side! ;)

clj.android is a GREAT idea.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Wonder Why Not Paths Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-03-31 23:07 +1300
  Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 20:25 +0200
    Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-03-31 21:13 +0100
      Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 22:18 +0200

csiph-web