Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2664
| From | Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Wonder Why Not Paths |
| Date | 2011-03-31 21:13 +0100 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103312109390.5114@urchin.earth.li> (permalink) |
| References | <in1jp3$65c$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <in2gud$b2g$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > On 31/03/2011 12:07, Lawrence D'Oliveiro allegedly wrote: >> A Drawable can be a ShapeDrawable, which can be constructed from a >> PathShape. But the resource definition >> <http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/drawable-resource.html#Shape> >> does not allow for paths. >> >> Curious omission, considering all the fancy stuff which has been added >> elsewhere. > > All the people giving a flying fuck about Android core libraries raise > your hand. Time for clj.android, perhaps? Still, the number of posts about Android are handily outnumbered by the number of posts of utterly worthless flaming and nitpicking that aren't even about anything. Why, in this thread alone, the ratio is 1:2! tom -- Come with me, and we'll go dreaming.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Wonder Why Not Paths Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-03-31 23:07 +1300
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 20:25 +0200
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-03-31 21:13 +0100
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 22:18 +0200
csiph-web