Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2662
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Wonder Why Not Paths |
| Date | 2011-03-31 20:25 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <in2gud$b2g$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <in1jp3$65c$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
On 31/03/2011 12:07, Lawrence D'Oliveiro allegedly wrote: > A Drawable can be a ShapeDrawable, which can be constructed from a > PathShape. But the resource definition > <http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/drawable-resource.html#Shape> > does not allow for paths. > > Curious omission, considering all the fancy stuff which has been added > elsewhere. All the people giving a flying fuck about Android core libraries raise your hand.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Wonder Why Not Paths Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-03-31 23:07 +1300
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 20:25 +0200
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-03-31 21:13 +0100
Re: Wonder Why Not Paths Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-31 22:18 +0200
csiph-web