Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26169

Re: Java vs C++

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From	Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java vs C++
Followup-To	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:07:51 +1300
Organization	Geek Central
Lines	16
Message-ID	<iio27n$g2f$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink)
References	<iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4d585c$0$81476$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <4d4d60dc$0$23763$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d4d8322$0$41117$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <iil53i$q34$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iil5ed$10m$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iil74u$rac$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iil9uk$b6m$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iinara$2up$4@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f43d9$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iink6l$87t$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f56ac$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iinmra$9er$7@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f61fb$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host	118-92-86-70.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
X-Trace	lust.ihug.co.nz 1297058871 16463 118.92.86.70 (7 Feb 2011 06:07:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@ihug.co.nz
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 7 Feb 2011 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	KNode/4.4.7
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26169

Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer

Show key headers only | View raw

In message <4d4f61fb$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

> On 06-02-2011 21:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message<4d4f56ac$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>
>>> As explained numerous times then Java generics and C++ templates
>>> are somewhat different.
>>
>> The only differences arise from limitations of Java, nothing more.
> 
> No. The differences arise from different decisions on what they
> wanted.

The Java designers wanted everything that C++ templates offered. The only 
parts they omitted were the ones they couldn’t have.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 15:53 +1300
  Re: Java vs C++ Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-08 10:25 +0000
    Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:53 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 10:26 +1100
    Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:17 +1300
      Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 16:51 +1100
  Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-06 22:06 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-06 22:42 -0800
  Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 21:20 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 22:07 -0500
    Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 19:07 +1300

csiph-web