Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26199
| Date | 2011-02-08 16:51 +1100 |
|---|---|
| From | Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java vs C++ |
| References | (12 earlier) <iinmra$9er$7@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f61fb$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iio27n$g2f$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d507f8a$0$32793$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iiqcjh$qt4$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Message-ID | <4d50d9fa$0$32794$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> (permalink) |
On 8/02/2011 2:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In that case, they went backwards. Because the whole “raw types” concept > detracts from and weakens the coherence of the type system. It provides backwards compatibility. Without that the product would be unusable. It is possible to wish that the entire product was designed at the same time, but it wasn't. In any case your contention was mistaken. The designers also went forwards a very considerable distance by providing generic classes that have provable type relationships among them. C++ simply doesn't have that. You need to stop overlooking this point.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 15:53 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-08 10:25 +0000
Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:53 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 10:26 +1100
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:17 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 16:51 +1100
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-06 22:06 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-06 22:42 -0800
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 21:20 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 22:07 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 19:07 +1300
csiph-web