Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26170

Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals?

From	Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals?
Date	2011-02-05 13:09 +0000
Organization	UK Free Software Network
Message-ID	<iiji77$4fe$1@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References	<iig4k2$sus$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ejeok6d6v98ju1tpqt5cq3vhko813q4def@4ax.com> <iihvhv$v02$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <tk2pk6d1m27fop2cr94sbe4hn9c0io44je@4ax.com> <iii3iv$1uu$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:54:06 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> And Arabic script was adopted by a whole lot of different languages
> which had sounds that Arabic did not. So they had to make up their own
> letters, most commonly by adding different numbers of dots to the
> existing shapes.
>
Arabic Letters also have different glyphs depending on whether they are 
at the start, middle or end of a word or an isolated letter, though six 
letters only have isolated and end-of-word representations. Unicode 
supports this with a code point for each representation of each letter.


-- 
martin@   | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org       |

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-02-04 10:26 -0800
  Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-05 12:54 +1300
    Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-02-05 13:09 +0000
  Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-04 18:10 -0500
  Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-02-04 15:29 -0800

csiph-web