Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2849
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:24:53 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java.lang vs java.util |
| Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:22:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f0ljp61iuueue7f2he01pl45c69cbdug4q@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <in67lq$rgo$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <e9hdp69clnqs8hijq8skm1ig0sh4c464ai@4ax.com> <in6h2v$144$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <FoZlp.4488$zn.74@newsfe19.iad> <inarau$gr4$6@lust.ihug.co.nz> <dt6mp.2629$0r7.144@newsfe12.iad> <inb4i8$m5l$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ct9mp.1376$YL5.219@newsfe05.iad> <inbg1v$sf7$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <nKgmp.2643$0r7.2582@newsfe12.iad> <inc8uc$art$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <1pmdnV_xgP4ENATQnZ2dnUVZ876dnZ2d@telenor.com> |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 12 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-e0iZRt17yoU5PRrpAhZmXaGdZsG8hnq75t/P9ar2rnnFwnkiITKSPI83wYgAqFBRG12FfUYlOJZt0Kc!IG0LDhc8v1iiZ1kq2217SW0NtveyrBpnmV6x+0fQHQFnz4tnkQTFnjDX3obnFQRFq7A4knZEPvfd!XrQ= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1858 |
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2849 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 06:20:57 -0500, Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> wrote: >An actual implementation includes both intended behaviour and >incidental behaviour, but without knowing which is which any translation >of the implementation to a different language or environment will be >awkward. And all too often the actual implementation omits intended behaviour as well. rossum
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 17:11 +1300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-01 21:23 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 01:52 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:50 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:12 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:37 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-03 08:05 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 09:33 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:57 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:38 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-01 23:43 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 19:52 +1300
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-03 08:05 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 10:11 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 19:25 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 12:49 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 22:50 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 16:05 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-04 07:06 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 23:10 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-04 06:20 -0500
Re: java.lang vs java.util rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-04 15:22 +0100
Re: java.lang vs java.util Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-04 05:58 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:34 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-07 10:22 +0100
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-04 18:41 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-04 07:04 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-04 07:58 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-04 18:46 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-02 16:22 -0400
csiph-web