Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18462
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out |
| Date | Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:16:28 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Lines | 50 |
| Message-ID | <ei604819trie2avefhs4punmav31tmibuo@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <6luv38htl4ve3ldqv0pd1pmu876gddq2v6@4ax.com> <50400827$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k1p1fp$24v$1@dont-email.me> |
| Reply-To | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | K2Qzzs3EAqXk5RLzfhxcSw.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:18462 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:45:42 -0700, markspace <-@.> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >There was an article on Slate about Java recently. Does this fix >address the issues it mentions? >http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/08/29/java_zero_day_vulnerability_why_you_should_disable_java_on_your_browser_right_now_.html> The tone of the article made me suspicious. The author seems all to eager to tell people to uninstall Java without explaining why. I have heard so much BS about the danger of Java. Crying wolf on that scale should be a criminal offence, or at least get you sued. On the other paw, this update follows fast on the heels of the previous one. That would only normally happen if there were a very important security fix. Oracle say that 1.7.0_07 fixes http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2012-4681-1835715.html But they are unusually vague about what the security vulnerability is, ostensibly to avoid giving hints to exploiters. It sounds like it applies only to unsigned applets on malicious websites. It is probably 1000 times easier for a malicious website to use JavaScript than this exploit. "zero day" does not tell us much about the vulnerability. A zero-day (or zero-hour or day zero) attack or threat is an attack that exploits a previously unknown vulnerability in a computer application, meaning that the attack occurs on "day zero" of awareness of the vulnerability.[1] This means that the developers have had zero days to address and patch the vulnerability. Zero-day exploits (actual software that uses a security hole to carry out an attack) are used or shared by attackers before the developer of the target software knows about the vulnerability. This article claims Oracle knew about this but sat on their thumbs. It also says the attack came from China and allows any code at all to be run. http://www.informationweek.com/security/attacks/java-zero-day-malware-attack-6-facts/240006535 This article says 1.7.0_07 fixes the vulnerability. http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/oracle_patches_java_zero-day_vulnerability/ -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. ~ Max Planck 1858-04-23 1947-10-04
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 16:44 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:41 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 17:45 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:52 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 19:16 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 06:02 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 23:29 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:38 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 20:20 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-09-01 06:38 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-02 02:15 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 19:53 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:36 -0400
csiph-web