Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18487
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out |
| Date | 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <o3e2489sn660eqtnrvsghhe4oakast6tl4@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <6luv38htl4ve3ldqv0pd1pmu876gddq2v6@4ax.com> <50400827$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k1p1fp$24v$1@dont-email.me> <ei604819trie2avefhs4punmav31tmibuo@4ax.com> <slrnk40ksb.mg5.fredrik@scout.jonson.org> |
On 31 Aug 2012 06:02:43 GMT, Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >That an attacking applet has to be unsigned doesn't limit the severety of >this vunerability. If the vunerability was only exploitable by signed >applets, the risk would be somewhat more limited. As it stands right now, >any script kiddie can compile and publish exploiting code. A signed applet is by definition dangerous. It is typically allowed to read/write any files it pleases. Normally unsigned applets are the safest things going, though I have heard so many false claims they are not. That is why I was initially suspicious. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. ~ Max Planck 1858-04-23 1947-10-04
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 16:44 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:41 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 17:45 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:52 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 19:16 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 06:02 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 23:29 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:38 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 20:20 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-09-01 06:38 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-02 02:15 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 19:53 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:36 -0400
csiph-web