Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18487

Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out

From Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out
Date 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700
Organization Canadian Mind Products
Message-ID <o3e2489sn660eqtnrvsghhe4oakast6tl4@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <6luv38htl4ve3ldqv0pd1pmu876gddq2v6@4ax.com> <50400827$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k1p1fp$24v$1@dont-email.me> <ei604819trie2avefhs4punmav31tmibuo@4ax.com> <slrnk40ksb.mg5.fredrik@scout.jonson.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 31 Aug 2012 06:02:43 GMT, Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org>
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>That an attacking applet has to be unsigned doesn't limit the severety of
>this vunerability. If the vunerability was only exploitable by signed
>applets, the risk would be somewhat more limited. As it stands right now,
>any script kiddie can compile and publish exploiting code.

A signed applet is by definition dangerous. It is typically allowed to
read/write any files it pleases. Normally unsigned applets are the
safest things going, though I have heard so many false claims they are
not.  That is why I was initially suspicious.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light,
but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
~ Max Planck 1858-04-23 1947-10-04 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 16:44 -0700
  Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:41 -0400
    Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 17:45 -0700
      Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:52 -0400
      Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 19:16 -0700
        Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 06:02 +0000
          Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 23:29 -0700
            Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:38 -0400
            Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 20:20 +0000
              Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-09-01 06:38 +0000
                Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-02 02:15 -0700
          Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700
            Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 19:53 -0400
        Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:36 -0400

csiph-web