Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18466
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out |
| Date | 2012-08-30 23:29 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k1plkf$r9n$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <6luv38htl4ve3ldqv0pd1pmu876gddq2v6@4ax.com> <50400827$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k1p1fp$24v$1@dont-email.me> <ei604819trie2avefhs4punmav31tmibuo@4ax.com> <slrnk40ksb.mg5.fredrik@scout.jonson.org> |
On 8/30/2012 11:02 PM, Fredrik Jonson wrote: > > Without pointing you to the source code of the exploit, which is widely > available this time, when reading the code it becomes trivially clear to > anyone that it allows the attacker to execute _any_ code on the target > machine. It evades the normal java sandbox completely. But only for Java 7. Java 6 is fine. I'm really appreciating Firefox right now. Earlier this year Firefox forced me to do an upgrade of itself, then it invalidated my Java plug-in and forced a re-installation of that as well. Yes, OK, whatever Firefox; I didn't think too much about it afterwards even though it annoyed me at the time. Now I just double-checked and realized that I've had the 1.6 version of the plug-in this whole time, even though I know I've had Java 7 since it first came out. Bravo for Firefox keeping the secure version instead of using the latest version.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 16:44 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:41 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 17:45 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-30 20:52 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-30 19:16 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 06:02 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-30 23:29 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:38 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-08-31 20:20 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-09-01 06:38 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-02 02:15 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:21 -0700
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 19:53 -0400
Re: JDK 1.7.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_35 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-31 15:36 -0400
csiph-web