Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2816
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe12.iad.POSTED!8ad76e89!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java.lang vs java.util |
| References | <in67lq$rgo$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <e9hdp69clnqs8hijq8skm1ig0sh4c464ai@4ax.com> <in6h2v$144$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <FoZlp.4488$zn.74@newsfe19.iad> <inarau$gr4$6@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| In-Reply-To | <inarau$gr4$6@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 38 |
| Message-ID | <dt6mp.2629$0r7.144@newsfe12.iad> (permalink) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@newsgroups-download.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:25:13 UTC |
| Organization | Public Usenet Newsgroup Access |
| Date | Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:25:16 -0300 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2816 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 11-04-03 07:11 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message <FoZlp.4488$zn.74@newsfe19.iad>, David Lamb wrote: > >> On 02/04/2011 2:52 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> In message<e9hdp69clnqs8hijq8skm1ig0sh4c464ai@4ax.com>, Roedy Green >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It might have something to do with Iterator/Iterable being introduced >>>> late, after Enumeration. >>> >>> Why? They introduced other changes in java.lang. >>> >>>> To me, they both belong in java.lang.util >>> >>> Python shows how important iterators can be as a fundamental language >>> concept. >> >> Iterators as a fundamental language construct have been around since the >> '70s. > > And yet Java still has trouble with them. What specific problem is it that you've been unable to tackle in Java because of these purported shortcomings? I'm not interested in a novice explanation like "I can solve this problem like this in Python, and when I try to translate it line-by-line into Java I just can't do it"; I'm curious as to what the actual problem is that you're struggling with in Java. We realize you're quite new with the language; you can't be expected to be expert yet. AHS -- That's not the recollection that I recall...All this information is certainly in the hands of the auditor and we certainly await his report to indicate what he deems has occurred. -- Halifax, Nova Scotia mayor Peter Kelly, who is currently deeply in the shit
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 17:11 +1300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-01 21:23 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 01:52 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:50 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-02 09:12 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:37 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-03 08:05 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 09:33 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:57 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:38 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-01 23:43 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 19:52 +1300
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-03 08:05 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 10:11 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 19:25 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 12:49 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-03 22:50 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 16:05 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-04 07:06 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-04 23:10 +1200
Re: java.lang vs java.util Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-04 06:20 -0500
Re: java.lang vs java.util rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-04 15:22 +0100
Re: java.lang vs java.util Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-04 05:58 -0700
Re: java.lang vs java.util Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:34 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-07 10:22 +0100
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-04 18:41 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-04 07:04 -0300
Re: java.lang vs java.util Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-04 07:58 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-04 18:46 -0400
Re: java.lang vs java.util Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-02 16:22 -0400
csiph-web