Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21047
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-06 09:51 -0800 |
| References | <public-20130106091348@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <a507821e-173c-447f-a310-bb98f425f097@googlegroups.com> <e1778471-c18f-46e6-9a7e-d7d312d684c3@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <bdc51fed-5efc-4380-8162-6f4309155239@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? |
| From | "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> |
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:43:53 PM UTC-5, Lew wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > >> 1.) »public class HelloWorldApp« (because this is most common IIRC) > > > > > > > > > This the most common they are going to run into in real life and when you get in inheritance explain the difference between the 4 options. You should also point out (I know I will get flamed for this ;-)) that the only time you do not want to use "public" is in inner classes (which in my opinion should be outlawed anyways) > > > > Do you really mean just inner classes? Would you ban all nested classes > > outright? > > > > It would be a very, very boneheaded thing to outlaw inner classes. > > You'd destroy a common idiom for declaring listeners. You'd make lambdas > > impossible. You'd kill one of the most expressive features of Java, that > > was introduced to the language in the first place because of its great > > power. And get rid of one the most unreadable/widely abused parts of all Java code? Sounds good to me... almost everything done with inner/nested classes can be done cleaner with post 1.5 constructs that do not require impossible to read code.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 02:10 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:43 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:51 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:58 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 10:48 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:07 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:21 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:43 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 17:24 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 15:59 -0500
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:22 -0800
Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:35 -0500
csiph-web