Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21076

Re: "Hello world!" without a public class?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2013-01-06 13:22 -0800
References	<public-20130106091348@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <a507821e-173c-447f-a310-bb98f425f097@googlegroups.com> <e1778471-c18f-46e6-9a7e-d7d312d684c3@googlegroups.com> <bdc51fed-5efc-4380-8162-6f4309155239@googlegroups.com> <50e9e5b3$0$292$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Message-ID	<a76a3d62-0465-4870-a458-d0db33815938@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: "Hello world!" without a public class?
From	"Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, January 6, 2013 3:59:30 PM UTC-5, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 1/6/2013 12:51 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:43:53 PM UTC-5, Lew wrote:
> 
> >> Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> 
> >>> This the most common they are going to run into in real life and
> 
> >>> when you get in inheritance explain the difference between the 4
> 
> >>> options.   You should also point out (I know I will get flamed
> 
> >>> for this ;-)) that the only time you do not want to use "public"
> 
> >>> is in inner classes (which in my opinion should be outlawed
> 
> >>> anyways)
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Do you really mean just inner classes? Would you ban all nested
> 
> >> classes
> 
> >> outright?
> 
> >>
> 
> >> It would be a very, very boneheaded thing to outlaw inner classes.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> You'd destroy a common idiom for declaring listeners. You'd make
> 
> >> lambdas
> 
> >>
> 
> >> impossible. You'd kill one of the most expressive features of Java,
> 
> >> that
> 
> >>
> 
> >> was introduced to the language in the first place because of its
> 
> >> great
> 
> >> power.
> 
> >
> 
> > And get rid of one the most unreadable/widely abused parts of all
> 
> > Java code?   Sounds good to me... almost everything done with
> 
> > inner/nested classes can be done cleaner with post 1.5 constructs
> 
> > that do not require impossible to read code.
> 
> 
> 
> What post 1.5 constructs can replace inner classes?
> 
> 
> 
> Arne

See previous message

Thread

Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 02:10 -0800
  Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:43 -0800
    Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:51 -0800
      Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 09:58 -0800
        Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 10:48 -0800
          Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:07 -0500
            Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:21 -0800
              Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:43 -0500
          Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 17:24 -0800
      Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 15:59 -0500
        Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? "Aryeh M. Friedman" <Aryeh.Friedman@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:22 -0800
          Re: "Hello world!" without a public class? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-06 16:35 -0500

csiph-web