Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18727
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-12 23:15 -0700 |
| References | <19af6b94-7a1e-4491-afb2-79782406f560@googlegroups.com> <k2o8sm$ve3$1@dont-email.me> <fea53dab-0659-4f9f-af44-c181c4508aa1@googlegroups.com> <504fe3a6$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <505109cf$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <af44cf50-2495-42c6-89f6-ba52c0d60791@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: can't throw |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Lew wrote:
>>> Eric Sosman wrote:
>>>> Some people, deeper thinkers than I, consider the whole
>>>> business of checked exceptions a nuisance or a misfeature. The
>
>>> Those people are mistaken.
>
>>>> need for a dodge like the above can be seen as evidence for
>>>> that viewpoint, but I don't find it overwhelmingly convincing.
>
>>> Not even suggestive, much less convincing.
>
>>>> In any event, that's Java As It Is And Is Likely To Remain, so
>
>>> and for good reason.
>
>> I must admit that personally I like the checked exception
>> context.
>
> It makes a lot of sense if you are API centric.
>
> A contract "I will either return a value of type X or throw
> one of the exceptions E1,...,En" seems a lot more strict than
> "I will either return a value of type X or throw an exception
> but I will not tell you which".
Agreed, although some chafe at the restriction, and point out
that other code works just fine without such things.
In some cases that's because the platform implicitly supports
some exception-handling mechanism that wraps more than what
Java's does, or the language uses some assertion-like mechanism
to render exceptions moot.
Java's checked exceptions serve a real but optional need, not
only to be strict, but to warn API users (yes, this is an
API-centric or API-ontologic view) of expected exceptions.
Otherwise all exceptions are RuntimeExceptions or worse, and
by definition come as a surprise.
By convention and just the way it works out, RuntimeExceptions
are for program(mer) errors. The infamous NPE is an example.
Most use cases are better served by explicit null guards than
exception tosses.
Not to say that RuntimeExceptions aren't useful; they are.
The suggestions here to wrap checked exceptions in them
are an example. That's because an exception visible to one
thread from another are a surprise, and most likely a
program(mer) error. *Especially* because checked exceptions
are by definition expected and should usually not propagate
outside their thread.
Into logs, yes. As exceptions, not.
Throwing 'Exception' itself is a Dark Art. You can play
with poison - there are valid reasons to do so.
'Error' and raw 'Throwable' - whatever the interpretation here,
it's a bad-ass event.
Like all programming idioms, when you write exceptions
you should have a good flair for their purpose. Arne makes
sense - balances a case for their utility with a recognition
of both their limits and that people do without them.
As he says overthread, "One needs to think about the issue anyway."
Exceptions provide one way to express the decisions you make on
how to handle it.
A key for me is an idea that some code path is exceptional,
and another is a "happy" path. Another key is that I pair
(not) throwing an exception with an assertion.
Example:
public void foo(Bar param)
{
if (param == null || param.getBaz() != State.READY)
{
throw new IllegalStateException("Bad param "+param);
}
assert param != null && param.getBaz() == State.READY;
. . .
}
--
Lew
All rules of thumb are useful as far as they go. But no farther.
As a rule.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can't throw bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-11 13:16 -0700
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-11 13:34 -0700
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 14:15 -0700
Re: can't throw Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-11 17:02 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 14:17 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-11 21:21 -0400
Re: can't throw Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-09-11 21:59 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-12 09:18 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 19:09 +0200
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-12 10:56 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:36 -0400
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-12 18:29 -0700
Re: can't throw Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-09-12 18:34 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 21:37 -0400
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 21:54 -0400
Re: can't throw Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-09-12 11:27 -0600
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:24 -0400
Re: can't throw Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-09-13 22:20 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 09:49 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-14 20:50 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 13:02 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 14:06 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 13:16 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:07 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 14:28 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-16 20:04 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:16 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 23:15 -0700
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-14 17:33 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-16 15:46 +0200
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-16 12:17 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-16 22:36 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-16 20:07 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 07:41 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-17 09:51 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 21:00 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-17 13:23 -0700
Re: can't throw Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-09-17 18:52 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 11:22 -0700
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-17 02:52 -0500
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-17 02:39 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 21:02 +0200
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-11 14:28 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-11 21:14 -0400
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:11 -0400
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 08:31 +0200
Re: can't throw bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-12 11:40 -0700
Re: can't throw Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-12 15:50 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 12:52 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 23:24 +0200
Re: can't throw Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-12 15:10 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-13 23:32 +0200
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:06 -0400
Re: can't throw Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-12 20:55 -0700
csiph-web