Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18772
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-14 13:02 -0700 |
| References | (4 earlier) <zy7f3qajj0sa.u9hsothk0nnw$.dlg@40tude.net> <50510bbc$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <h7kuo77qjaim$.vgolgvvfs7kc.dlg@40tude.net> <ion658l9c0jpn2v239660jlctjqdath7bb@4ax.com> <abhck3Fdgb0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <7ec08bd8-0faa-41ff-bda2-bc433b5ed92a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: can't throw |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Robert Klemme wrote: > Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> It may not be nearly as elegant, but I still prefer BASIC's ON >> ERROR GOTO handling. Yes, one had to sort through the error numbers, >> but that made it easier in some ways. One could code something to >> handle the few cases where there was a specific handling and then use >> a catch-all for the rest. And you can't do that with Java exceptions? > Well, you can do _that_ in Java, too. Ah, I thought so. So what was that advantage of BASIC's approach again? > I find the distinction between checked and unchecked exceptions pretty > good - although the distribution of exception types across these > categories does not always seem to be wisely made in the standard library. API writing is a Dark Art, or rather a Dark Artish approach to programming generally. It's arguably the best approach. But designing the exception API is Darker Art. People who complain about checked exceptions always take the client point of view, and always blame Java. (Counterexamples welcome.) But if they are so bad, why do API writers opt to use them? I know the answer. Do you? Regardless, why blame Java for the API writer's choice? As for comparing to other languages that don't have checked exceptions, that's utter bullshit. Bullshit, I say. You can't compare the API writer's choices when they don't have the same options. So writers of code in those other, lesser languages that don't have checked exceptions resort to some other idiom, simply because the checked exception idiom doesn't exist. So of course it works, because they use the mechanisms that their languages *do* provide. Duh, and double-duh. Drawing the conclusion that checked exceptions aren't necessary, given some other mechanism to accomplish equivalent goals, is hardly insightful. Drawing the conclusion from that evidence that checked exceptions are somehow inferior to those other mechanisms is fallacious. What is valid is to compare decisions to use or not use checked exceptions in environments where they are available. Interesting then, that in such environments that good programmers find checked exceptions useful. If you don't like their insistence that you honor the exception contract they designed, don't use their libraries. Just like if you don't like their insistence that you honor the argument contract they designed, don't use their libraries. Just don't blame Java for providing the API writer the tools to force you to deal with something they thought important enough to force you to deal with. Thank God and the Java Founders that checked exceptions were available to that API writer to enforce that contract on you, otherwise a) they couldn't ensure you honor certain robustness requirements, and b) you couldn't be sure of exactly what exceptional situations they really insist you handle. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can't throw bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-11 13:16 -0700
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-11 13:34 -0700
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 14:15 -0700
Re: can't throw Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-11 17:02 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 14:17 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-11 21:21 -0400
Re: can't throw Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-09-11 21:59 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-12 09:18 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 19:09 +0200
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-12 10:56 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:36 -0400
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-12 18:29 -0700
Re: can't throw Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-09-12 18:34 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 21:37 -0400
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 21:54 -0400
Re: can't throw Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-09-12 11:27 -0600
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:24 -0400
Re: can't throw Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-09-13 22:20 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 09:49 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-14 20:50 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 13:02 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 14:06 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-14 13:16 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:07 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 14:28 -0700
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-16 20:04 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:16 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 23:15 -0700
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-14 17:33 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-16 15:46 +0200
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-16 12:17 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-16 22:36 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-16 20:07 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 07:41 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-17 09:51 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 21:00 +0200
Re: can't throw Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-17 13:23 -0700
Re: can't throw Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-09-17 18:52 +0200
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 11:22 -0700
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-17 02:52 -0500
Re: can't throw Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-09-17 02:39 -0500
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-17 21:02 +0200
Re: can't throw markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-11 14:28 -0700
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-11 21:14 -0400
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:11 -0400
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 08:31 +0200
Re: can't throw bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-12 11:40 -0700
Re: can't throw Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-12 15:50 -0400
Re: can't throw Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 12:52 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-12 23:24 +0200
Re: can't throw Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-12 15:10 -0700
Re: can't throw Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-13 23:32 +0200
Re: can't throw Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-12 18:06 -0400
Re: can't throw Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-12 20:55 -0700
csiph-web