Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9450
| From | bob <bob@coolgroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | iteration blues |
| Date | 2011-11-03 08:37 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <a84ab4cf-a960-4783-a955-0718438dab63@bq8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
So, I wrote this code for some particle effects:
package com.coolfone.particles;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Vector;
import javax.microedition.khronos.opengles.GL10;
public class FireManager {
static Vector<Particle> particles = new Vector<Particle>();
public static void startfire(float x, float y) {
for (int ctr = 0; ctr < 100; ctr++) {
Particle p = new Particle();
p.x = (float) (x + Math.random()-.5);
p.y = (float) (y + Math.random()-.5);
p.dx = (float) (Math.random()-.5)/4f;
p.dy = (float) (Math.random()-.5)/4f;
p.timeleft = (int) (Math.random() * 50 + 50);
particles.add(p);
}
}
public static void burnfire() {
Iterator<Particle> i = particles.iterator();
Vector<Particle> removelist = new Vector<Particle>();
while (i.hasNext()) {
Particle p = i.next();
p.move();
p.timeleft--;
if (p.timeleft == 0) removelist.add(p);
}
particles.removeAll(removelist);
}
public static void drawfire(GL10 gl) {
Iterator<Particle> i = particles.iterator();
while (i.hasNext()) {
Particle p = i.next();
p.draw(gl);
}
}
}
I'm concerned about inefficiency in the burnfire function. Does
anyone know how to rewrite this quickly if particles was a linked
list? The main issue is that I'm not sure if removing items during
iteration messes up the iterator.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
iteration blues bob <bob@coolgroups.com> - 2011-11-03 08:37 -0700
Re: iteration blues Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-11-03 08:51 -0700
Re: iteration blues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 09:32 -0700
Re: iteration blues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-04 21:00 -0400
Re: iteration blues spk <jhic@speak.invalid> - 2011-11-05 07:48 -0400
Re: iteration blues Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-03 09:31 -0700
Re: iteration blues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 13:50 -0700
Re: iteration blues Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-04 08:07 -0700
Re: iteration blues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-04 21:02 -0400
Re: iteration blues Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-03 10:08 -0700
Re: iteration blues Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 22:22 -0700
Re: iteration blues Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-04 10:34 +0100
Re: iteration blues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 10:46 -0700
Re: iteration blues Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-04 23:55 +0100
Re: iteration blues Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-04 21:06 -0400
Re: iteration blues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 20:30 -0700
Re: iteration blues bob <bob@coolgroups.com> - 2011-11-05 12:40 -0700
Re: iteration blues Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 16:14 -0400
Re: iteration blues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 13:41 -0700
Re: iteration blues bob <bob@coolgroups.com> - 2011-11-04 13:42 -0700
csiph-web