Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12835
| From | Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: SimpleFormatter Question |
| References | <XnsA011D2474C732jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <4f5ab90d$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <XnsA011F1BB1A949jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <XnsA011F3BCFD12Ajpnasty@94.75.214.39> |
| Message-ID | <YDI6r.12585$wf.1272@newsfe09.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Public Usenet Newsgroup Access |
| Date | 2012-03-10 09:26 -0400 |
On 12-03-10 12:57 AM, Novice wrote: [ SNIP ] > > One followup question. When I tried this in my logging.properties: > > java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter.format = "%4$s: %5$s [%1$tc]%n" > > The log messages included quotes that weren't found in the result > predicted by the SimpleFormatter documentation. When I removed the quotes > from the line I've just quoted, the messages came out the way they were > supposed to. > > In other words, it appears that the quotes shown in the Javadoc don't > belong there. Should I be filing a Bugzilla for that so that Oracle can > fix the documentation? Or is there a different procedure to follow? > > Of course, someone may have already filed a report for this small error; > I haven't checked yet. And maybe this error is so small and obvious that > anyone would figure it out as quickly as I did. > Read up on Properties, especially http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Properties.html#load(java.io.Reader). Quotes aren't special as far as Properties is concerned. How special they are depends on what does the "load" and eventually uses the values (RHS of the key=value pair). More often than not a quote does have special meaning there, and you might end up either double-quoting in the properties file or doing some more quoting in the client code. But if a quote isn't special to a particular user, then it'll just be another character. It's not small and obvious, no. This kind of documentation error presumably has frustrated a fair few people. I don't know why the SimpleFormatter documentors made that mistake; they likely didn't understand Properties either. You could *check* Bugzilla to see if it's already noted. Lesson learned: supposedly authoritative documentation has its fair share of errors, some much worse than what you just encountered. AHS -- Last week I helped my friend stay put. It's a lot easier'n helpin' 'em move. I just went over to his house and made sure that he did not start to load shit into a truck. -- Mitch Hedberg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
SimpleFormatter Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-10 01:40 +0000
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 21:14 -0500
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-10 04:45 +0000
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-10 04:57 +0000
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-03-10 09:26 -0400
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-10 17:55 +0000
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-10 10:27 -0800
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-10 20:47 +0000
Re: SimpleFormatter Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-10 12:08 -0500
csiph-web