Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12834
| From | Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Quick Error Handling Question |
| Organization | none |
| References | <XnsA00CCE30F52F5jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <jj1b0h$h6s$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2012-03-10 15:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <m3vcmc1tiu.fsf@despammed.com> (permalink) |
markspace <-@.> writes: > On 3/4/2012 5:10 PM, Novice wrote: >> Should I write stacktraces from my checked and unchecked exceptions to my >> log? > I can't think of anyone who advocates logging literal > stacktraces. Usually, the log system will do something like that for you, The stacktraces are valuable when the software is in development stage. And also, IF something crashes in production, they are very useful. An end user doesn't expect to see a stacktrace and shouldn't usually be shown it, but logging it often gives good information. > Also, only log exceptions that actually unexpected or error conditions. If > a poorly written API forces you to catch an exception as part of something > that could be considered a normal return value, don't bother logging it if Agreed. And those unexpected exceptions are where also the stacktrace may be useful. -- Jukka Lahtinen
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Quick Error Handling Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-05 01:10 +0000
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-03-04 17:20 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 20:29 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-03-04 17:35 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 20:58 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-03-04 18:11 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 21:42 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-03-04 19:26 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 22:44 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-03-04 21:20 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 21:26 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 20:22 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-05 02:48 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-04 21:01 -0500
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-05 22:59 +0000
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-03-05 19:55 -0400
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-06 00:01 +0000
Re: Quick Error Handling Question markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-04 19:13 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-03-10 15:21 +0200
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-04 22:34 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-03-05 02:25 -0800
Re: Quick Error Handling Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-05 13:51 +0000
csiph-web