Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9961

Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:28:51 +0100
Lines 47
Message-ID <9idj1eF8msU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <j9k23f$u03$1@dont-email.me> <2244638.2045.1321057203472.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prep8> <j9kf5g$ldr$1@dont-email.me> <u_rvq.24671$Us1.13168@newsfe16.iad> <4ebe8090$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7580854.318.1321121258309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlm15> <F06wq.37583$0s1.33690@newsfe11.iad> <7958763.239.1321281909576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prou19>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net Iq9IiyoEVk/jOBJfMikVyg7mM551ngreAIBG5WXAPUVcrEti0=
Cancel-Lock sha1:8FlhZlJI1M0xOVhUdLgnOgm1FZY=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
In-Reply-To <7958763.239.1321281909576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prou19>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:9961

Show key headers only | View raw


On 14.11.2011 15:45, Lew wrote:
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>> What actually holds us back with adoption of recent Java (JDK/JRE)
>> versions is not any particular reluctance on the part of most
>> clients to keep up with the Joneses in that respect, but because
>> they are very conservative with all their major software (like app
>> servers)...which if it's not certified for a later Java means we
>> can't move to it.
>
> That's just the same phenomenon - "not certified for a later Java"
> means that someone was unwilling to move to that later Java until it
> was EOLed.
>
> Why don't the vendors certify for the later Java in anything less
> than five years?
>
> It's the same question.  Pushing it back one level doesn't answer
> it.

One reason might be the partial failure of the promise of GC.  What I 
mean is this: when introduced to GC the usual message is that it is 
better than manual memory management and with it software will be more 
robust (i.e. not throwing cores, some may even claim that there are no 
memory leaks) by having the JVM decide when to collect which garbage. 
Also, developers will be more productive etc.  This works remarkably 
well in a number of situations.

However, the enterprise world often has more demanding requirements 
(such as dealing with large memory *and* low latency at the same time). 
  Whoever went through the exercise of tuning GC settings (of which 
there are plenty - just execute [1] on your favorite JVM) for such an 
application will be very reluctant to switch to a new Java version (or 
other garbage collector for that matter).  If you have found a set of 
settings with which your application works reliably as expected then you 
are not easily giving it up because the cost to go through the testing, 
measuring etc. with a new JVM can be significant.

Kind regards

	robert

[1] Find out all the options:
$ java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-11 12:55 -0800
  Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-11 16:20 -0800
    Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-11 16:38 -0800
      Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-12 06:36 -0400
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 09:19 -0500
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-12 10:07 -0800
            Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 17:09 -0500
            Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-14 06:25 -0400
              Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-14 06:45 -0800
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-14 23:28 +0100
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-15 20:34 -0500
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 22:28 -0800
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-16 07:43 -0700
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2011-11-16 12:53 -0500
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-16 12:20 -0600
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-16 14:27 -0700
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 14:04 -0800
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 10:05 -0700
                Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-16 18:57 -0500
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 09:23 -0500
    Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-13 09:12 -0800
      Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:39 -0500
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-13 20:13 +0000
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 15:43 -0500
            Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-13 21:06 +0000
              Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 16:16 -0500
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-14 08:03 -0600
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-14 06:51 -0800
  Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-12 04:53 -0800
  Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-12 14:02 -0800
    Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 17:09 -0500
      Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-12 19:14 -0800
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-12 20:56 -0700
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 05:08 -0800
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 10:08 -0500
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-13 08:08 -0800
            Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:23 -0500
        Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-13 09:23 -0800
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:27 -0500
          Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 11:08 -0800

csiph-web