Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9961
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot |
| Date | Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:28:51 +0100 |
| Lines | 47 |
| Message-ID | <9idj1eF8msU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <j9k23f$u03$1@dont-email.me> <2244638.2045.1321057203472.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prep8> <j9kf5g$ldr$1@dont-email.me> <u_rvq.24671$Us1.13168@newsfe16.iad> <4ebe8090$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7580854.318.1321121258309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlm15> <F06wq.37583$0s1.33690@newsfe11.iad> <7958763.239.1321281909576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prou19> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net Iq9IiyoEVk/jOBJfMikVyg7mM551ngreAIBG5WXAPUVcrEti0= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:8FlhZlJI1M0xOVhUdLgnOgm1FZY= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <7958763.239.1321281909576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prou19> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:9961 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 14.11.2011 15:45, Lew wrote: > Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> What actually holds us back with adoption of recent Java (JDK/JRE) >> versions is not any particular reluctance on the part of most >> clients to keep up with the Joneses in that respect, but because >> they are very conservative with all their major software (like app >> servers)...which if it's not certified for a later Java means we >> can't move to it. > > That's just the same phenomenon - "not certified for a later Java" > means that someone was unwilling to move to that later Java until it > was EOLed. > > Why don't the vendors certify for the later Java in anything less > than five years? > > It's the same question. Pushing it back one level doesn't answer > it. One reason might be the partial failure of the promise of GC. What I mean is this: when introduced to GC the usual message is that it is better than manual memory management and with it software will be more robust (i.e. not throwing cores, some may even claim that there are no memory leaks) by having the JVM decide when to collect which garbage. Also, developers will be more productive etc. This works remarkably well in a number of situations. However, the enterprise world often has more demanding requirements (such as dealing with large memory *and* low latency at the same time). Whoever went through the exercise of tuning GC settings (of which there are plenty - just execute [1] on your favorite JVM) for such an application will be very reluctant to switch to a new Java version (or other garbage collector for that matter). If you have found a set of settings with which your application works reliably as expected then you are not easily giving it up because the cost to go through the testing, measuring etc. with a new JVM can be significant. Kind regards robert [1] Find out all the options: $ java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-11 12:55 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-11 16:20 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-11 16:38 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-12 06:36 -0400
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 09:19 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-12 10:07 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 17:09 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-14 06:25 -0400
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-14 06:45 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-14 23:28 +0100
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-15 20:34 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 22:28 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-16 07:43 -0700
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.de> - 2011-11-16 12:53 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-16 12:20 -0600
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-16 14:27 -0700
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 14:04 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 10:05 -0700
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-16 18:57 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 09:23 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-13 09:12 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:39 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-13 20:13 +0000
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-13 21:06 +0000
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 16:16 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-14 08:03 -0600
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-14 06:51 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-12 04:53 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-12 14:02 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-12 17:09 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-12 19:14 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-12 20:56 -0700
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 05:08 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 10:08 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-13 08:08 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:23 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-13 09:23 -0800
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 11:08 -0800
csiph-web