Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14635
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: How is this "pattern" called? |
| Date | 2012-05-18 15:29 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <54jdr7164mceis033e8f7amqb3qhjdfv9r@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ydnlikpbhon.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <lp2dr7da6p0jslnua32ldd4uki1036ibfs@4ax.com> <jp67dc$fe8$1@dont-email.me> <rhedr7ti7idd7ratbaludl5m14jo60p04l@4ax.com> <z_CdncDz595QXSvSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:35:57 -0700, Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
wrote:
>On 5/18/2012 2:13 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
[snip]
>> With all of the hoopla over OOP patterns, it is difficult for me
>> to tell how much they are really needed.
>>
>> Yes, I go for keeping it fairly simple.
>
>I think a lot depends on the answer to one key question:
>
>What is the cost if this needs to be changed?
Exactly.
>If we are talking about a widely distributed API, where a change will
>break thousands of programs, it is worth doing a lot to minimize the
>risk of incompatible change. If we are talking about code that is used
>in a couple of places in one program, KISS and refactor if necessary.
I quite agree with you.
With the amount of noise over patterns though, you would think
that many people need the patterns. For me, supporting an in-house
application, there is no or little need. I suspect that there are
many in my situation.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-05-18 10:03 -0600
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 10:50 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-18 12:20 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 14:13 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-05-18 14:35 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 15:29 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:38 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-20 11:34 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-20 14:59 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-05-20 12:03 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-20 13:19 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:32 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-02 09:25 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:40 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:33 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:32 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-18 15:28 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:37 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:43 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-21 00:09 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-21 10:04 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 23:58 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:33 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:44 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-21 00:11 -0700
csiph-web