Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14632
| Date | 2012-05-18 14:35 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: How is this "pattern" called? |
| References | <pattern-20120518104439@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ydnlikpbhon.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <lp2dr7da6p0jslnua32ldd4uki1036ibfs@4ax.com> <jp67dc$fe8$1@dont-email.me> <rhedr7ti7idd7ratbaludl5m14jo60p04l@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <z_CdncDz595QXSvSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
On 5/18/2012 2:13 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2012 12:20:11 -0700, markspace<-@.> wrote: > >> On 5/18/2012 10:50 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >>> a case of KISS or maybe YAGNI. > >> I like these too; good thoughts. > > I have tended to avoid using OOP patterns except for what I came > up with myself. I did try reading one of the OOP patterns books, but > ugh! Some people seem to think that the last thing you should is do > in OOP is write a statement that actually instantiates an object. > (Qual horreur!) Instead, you call a factory -- is that it? -- and > have all sorts of indirection. > > If you *really* need that, fine, but I do not. The closest that > I have come to this is related classes needing common code. I have > them inherit from a class with that code. That code class is never > instantiated itself. > > With all of the hoopla over OOP patterns, it is difficult for me > to tell how much they are really needed. > > Yes, I go for keeping it fairly simple. I think a lot depends on the answer to one key question: What is the cost if this needs to be changed? If we are talking about a widely distributed API, where a change will break thousands of programs, it is worth doing a lot to minimize the risk of incompatible change. If we are talking about code that is used in a couple of places in one program, KISS and refactor if necessary. Patricia
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-05-18 10:03 -0600
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 10:50 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-18 12:20 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 14:13 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-05-18 14:35 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-18 15:29 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:38 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-20 11:34 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-20 14:59 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-05-20 12:03 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-20 13:19 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:32 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-02 09:25 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:40 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:33 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 14:32 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-18 15:28 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:37 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:43 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-21 00:09 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-21 10:04 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-30 23:58 +0200
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-19 22:33 -0400
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-20 20:44 -0700
Re: How is this "pattern" called? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-21 00:11 -0700
csiph-web