Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16537
| From | "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Message-ID | <50157A40.55508.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <50157A40.55505.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: David Lamb
From: "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5ky-this>
To: David Lamb
From: "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this>
To: David Lamb
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
On 27.07.2012 23:11, David Lamb wrote:
> I taught introductory programming for several years in several
> languages. You don't need to get as complex as backtracking. The natural
> places to teach recursion to introductory students are with binary tree
> search and quicksort, both of which can be taught in the first or second
> 1-semester course.
Right. Although I'd consider Quicksort too complex as an introduction to
recursion as the algorithms workings are not so easy to grasp and would
distract from the concept of recursion. Tree search seems to be the most
appropriate to me. Still, introducing recursion as a concept in programming
does not belong into class reference documentation. This is something for a
tutorial or other introductory material.
Kind regards
robert
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "David Lamb" <david.lamb@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-pvc-this> - 2012-07-29 19:19 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-x1c-this> - 2012-07-31 20:06 +0000
csiph-web