Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16530
| From | "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Message-ID | <50157A3F.55501.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <50157A3C.55487.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Robert Klemme
From: "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-5ky-this>
To: Robert Klemme
From: "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this>
To: Robert Klemme
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:02:52 +0200, Robert Klemme
<shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 27.07.2012 18:16, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
[snip]
>> If one does not already know the class, JavaDoc is not too useful.
>
>I disagree: there are so many classes that you typically know many and
>have a pretty good idea which one to use but need to look up the details
>from time to time (i.e. for classes you do not use on a regular basis or
>for usage which deviates from what you regularly do with the class).
Non sequitur.
Note that conditional "If one does not already know the class".
That is rather different from already having "a pretty good idea" about it.
Getting started can be the hardest part, and JavaDoc does not
help much there. Once I get started, the rest is often quite a bit easier.
Without that start though, one can be spinning one's wheels to little avail.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-z1h-this> - 2012-07-28 18:36 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "David Lamb" <david.lamb@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this> - 2012-07-29 18:16 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-pvc-this> - 2012-07-29 19:19 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-x1c-this> - 2012-07-31 20:06 +0000
csiph-web