Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15008
| From | Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: multithreaded cache? |
| References | <zsWdnVufD87Egy_SnZ2dnUVZ7oednZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <4fbf252e$0$87578$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <a29n7cFr61U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2012-06-02 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4fca6924$0$35601$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Sonic.Net |
In article <a29n7cFr61U1@mid.individual.net>, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 25.05.2012 08:22, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: > > Ha, this is an interview question that I use. > > > > What you need is row level locking for the cache load. > > But not all the time. See https://gist.github.com/2717818 The original post stated that duplicate element creation was too expensive. That code may create duplicate elements for a key and discard the extras. > > > Step 1) > > Use synchronized operations to map your key to a value; creating an > > uninitialized value in the map if needed. Use whatever tech you want. > > A synchronized block on a HashMap is simplest and performs the fastest > > on 1 or 2 core systems. A ConcurrentHashMap sometimes performs better > > with 4+ core systems. > > In my experience a CHM performs better even on a 1 or 2 core system. This depends on usage patterns. The Java 1.5 Concurrency locks used in some parts of CHM are very slow compared to synchronization. The Concurrency locks only have a chance of performing better when there are a lot of concurrent shared read locks. > > Step 2) > > Synchronize on the value. Initialize it if needed. > > > > > > Step 1 blocks all cache access for only for a very short moment to make > > sure that a key always has a value. Step 2 blocks access independently > > for each cache value to make sure that it is loaded. It will perform > > well for continuous use by several CPU cores. Google has some high > > concurrency Maps that aren't too bad either. > > Actually once the value is in the cache you do not need any step 2 > synchronization any more. Step 2 is initializing the value. It's critical to synchronize there or the second thread to request the same key may see an element that is not yet fully initialized. (Again, the original post stated that elements were expensive to create.) > > > In the 16 core range you'll find that any kind of exclusive lock causes > > stalls where threads suspend while holding locks, causing a backlog that > > reinforces itself. A concurrency expert can fix that using complex > > Compare-And-Swap designs. > > Basically this is what CHM does with putIfAbsent() internally. Yes, but you don't have access to its internal container class so CHM is not much use for caching elements that are very expensive to create. The Googlely version does provide a way to initialize the container with a factory callback; combining steps 1 and 2 here. > > Kind regards > > robert -- I will not see posts from Google because I must filter them as spam
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
multithreaded cache? bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2012-05-15 10:14 +0100
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-15 11:41 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-15 15:57 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-15 16:13 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-16 01:22 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-16 01:19 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-15 20:26 -0400
Re: multithreaded cache? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-05-15 21:41 -0300
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-16 09:26 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 14:54 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-16 22:03 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-21 15:25 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-15 08:22 -0400
Re: multithreaded cache? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-15 09:56 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2012-05-16 14:33 +0100
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-17 11:54 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-17 12:06 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-17 09:51 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-17 20:48 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2012-05-20 01:35 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2012-05-20 01:48 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-19 18:11 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-18 20:42 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-18 23:45 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-18 18:31 -0400
Re: multithreaded cache? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-18 22:15 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-19 07:09 -0400
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-19 12:33 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-19 14:24 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-21 21:15 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-23 23:11 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-24 23:05 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-24 20:11 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-25 17:42 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-05-25 07:09 -0300
Re: multithreaded cache? Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-05-21 15:21 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-05-24 23:22 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-25 17:36 +0200
Re: multithreaded cache? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-06-02 12:27 -0700
Re: multithreaded cache? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-02 21:54 +0200
csiph-web