Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4642
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-reader.telstra.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Date | Fri, 27 May 2011 18:07:09 +1000 |
| From | Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> |
| Reply-To | not.esmond.pitt@not.bigpond.com |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java generics and type erasure |
| References | <9d4c2b16-beb5-40b1-87a2-f03e971efeed@k17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <nospam-871A48.22542123052011@news.aioe.org> <irfgkl$lca$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEF8515AF3B6vaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irh6kb$gse$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEFA3AE378DDvaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irhhik$9rc$3@dont-email.me> <irjv7c$iv0$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <irk9dr$j5p$4@dont-email.me> <irkc5t$q84$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <irkkb6$c29$1@dont-email.me> <irkt4q$41b$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4dde10b0$0$67777$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <irlega$3kp$1@news.albasani.net> <4ddf0617$0$67777$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <irn1e0$gtb$1@news.albasani.net> <4ddf14c8$0$67785$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <irncmt$k84$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In-Reply-To | <irncmt$k84$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 8 |
| Message-ID | <4ddf5baf$0$67779$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 120.151.14.51 |
| X-Trace | 1306483631 exi-reader.telstra.net 67779 120.151.14.51:36510 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4642 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 27/05/2011 3:27 PM, Lew wrote: > The meaning of the assertion you cite was that the generics information > that is present in the bytecode is ignored at runtime No. There is no generic information in the bytecode to ignore. It has been erased by the compiler. The only generic information in the .class file is in the method signatures, and they are there for the compiler, not for the JVM.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400
csiph-web