Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4636
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-reader.telstra.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Date | Fri, 27 May 2011 13:04:38 +1000 |
| From | Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> |
| Reply-To | not.esmond.pitt@not.bigpond.com |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java generics and type erasure |
| References | <9d4c2b16-beb5-40b1-87a2-f03e971efeed@k17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <nospam-871A48.22542123052011@news.aioe.org> <irfgkl$lca$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEF8515AF3B6vaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irh6kb$gse$1@news.albasani.net> <Xns9EEFA3AE378DDvaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <irhhik$9rc$3@dont-email.me> <irjv7c$iv0$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <irk9dr$j5p$4@dont-email.me> <irkc5t$q84$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <irkkb6$c29$1@dont-email.me> <irkt4q$41b$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4dde10b0$0$67777$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <irlega$3kp$1@news.albasani.net> <4ddf0617$0$67777$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <irn1e0$gtb$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In-Reply-To | <irn1e0$gtb$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 11 |
| Message-ID | <4ddf14c8$0$67785$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 120.151.14.51 |
| X-Trace | 1306465480 exi-reader.telstra.net 67785 120.151.14.51:38686 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4636 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 27/05/2011 12:15 PM, Lew wrote: > Generics make a difference at compile time. They don't make a difference > at run time. Correct. > Then I can ignore what is and isn't in the bytecode. Unless you are asserting, and I quote, that 'it really does happen at runtime'. If there is no bytecode that executes that action, it really doesn't happen at runtime.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400
csiph-web