Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2953
| From | Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: calling own methods from constructor |
| Date | 2011-04-07 16:15 -0600 |
| Organization | As little as possible |
| Message-ID | <2pwrj56744.fsf@shell.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnippkd9.phi.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <2011040622233261380-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> <2pzko2f2nx.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <ce5128fc-f160-41f9-846a-71b1646dad33@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> writes: > Janney wrote: >> In Java evaluating new Bar() will throw an exception. But in C++ the >> equivalent code would print >> >> Override me! I dare you. >> Two guys walk into a... >> >> In effect, until the constructor of Foo completes, the object is >> considered to be an instance of Foo, so calls to virtualMethod() to to >> Foo.virtualMethod even if it has been overridden. After the super >> constructor completes, the object is treated as an instance of Bar, so >> evaluating new Bar().virtualMethod() would print two lines and then >> throw an exception. >> >> I've been surprised by this behaviour in C++ enough times that I'm not >> sure that it has the better approach. But a solution does exist. >> > > A solution to what, exactly? In the message I was replying to, in the text that you deleted, Owen Jacobsen correctly observed that >>> It's hard to prove that a constructor never calls a virtual method. Consider: This is a technical issue, and I observed that other languages have found ways to prevent virtual methods from being called before their owning objects have been fully constructed. One can debate whether this desirable, but C++ provides an existence proof that it's possible. > I ask because it sort of sounds like you're saying that C++ is a > solution to something in Java. I don't guess that's what you're > really saying, of course, but it leaves me wondering what that is. > What is the problem that you aver exists, and what is its solution to > it that you aver exists? Consider focussing on what I did say, instead of what it sort of sounds like I might have said. The solution is in the paragraph above, the one that starts with "In effect, until the constructor of Foo completes". -- Jim Janney
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-06 20:48 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-06 23:06 +0100
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 18:24 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 08:44 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-07 04:14 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 12:32 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-07 05:55 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 08:10 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 20:31 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 14:10 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 22:15 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 21:22 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-07 23:08 +0100
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 21:24 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-09 22:06 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-07 23:10 +0100
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 22:24 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 07:19 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 12:24 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-06 20:46 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 08:36 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-07 07:16 -0300
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 11:26 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-07 03:20 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 11:36 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 22:23 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 09:13 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tobias Blass <tobiasblass@gmx.net> - 2011-04-07 10:58 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 12:19 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Alessio Stalla <alessiostalla@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 10:40 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tobias Blass <tobiasblass@gmx.net> - 2011-04-07 19:00 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 20:11 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-04-07 14:36 -0600
Re: calling own methods from constructor Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-07 20:59 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-04-07 10:26 -0600
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 20:16 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 14:05 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-04-07 16:15 -0600
Re: calling own methods from constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-07 21:28 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 23:21 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 23:39 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 23:58 -0400
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-08 20:32 +0100
Re: calling own methods from constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-07 23:05 +0100
Re: calling own methods from constructor Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-04-07 17:38 -0600
Re: calling own methods from constructor Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-07 03:20 -0700
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-07 11:32 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-08 01:51 +0200
Re: calling own methods from constructor Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-08 01:56 +0200
Re: calling own methods from constructor Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-08 09:30 +0000
Re: calling own methods from constructor Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-08 20:02 +0200
csiph-web